Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: /s/ -> /h/ [was: Re: Betreft: Re: k(w)->p]

From:<raccoon@...>
Date:Monday, January 31, 2000, 2:32
> -----Original Message----- > From: Constructed Languages List [mailto:CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU]On > Behalf Of BP Jonsson > Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2000 4:26 PM > To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU > Subject: Re: /s/ -> /h/ [was: Re: Betreft: Re: k(w)->p] > > > At 22:14 +0100 27.1.2000, Raymond Brown wrote: > > > >Prevocalic and intervocalic /s/ became /h/ in early Greek (with > >intervocalic /h/ then generally disappearing. Prevocalic /s/ > became /h/ in > >Persian at some stage. And there are many more examples. > > It even happened *twice* in Persian: first in Old Iranian, where every > non-preconsonantal *s that hadn't already been changed into /S/ became /h/ > -- compare Greek _holos_ and Avestan _haurva_ to Sanskrit _sarva_ > and Latin > _salus_, all from an indo-european root meaning "whole" --, and > then in the > transition from Old Persian to Middle Persian, where /s/ derived from > earlier /T/ or /Tr/ became /h/ if it happened to have become > final (by loss > of final vowels mostly.) Thus Old Iranian *ga:Ta "hymn" > Middle Persian > _ga:h_. IIRC that word is not attested in OP, but is the usual example of > the younger change.
That only happened word-finally? What about Zarathustra > Zoroaster? Was that two words? Eric Christopherson raccoon@elknet.net