Re: racist vs racialist?
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 11, 2002, 0:39 |
En réponse à Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...>:
>
> Unfortunately, discrimination has acquired negative connotations in
> (American?) English. It now indicates acting preferentially towards
> one
> group of people (especially in terms of race, sex, religion, age,
> etc.)
> over another, and is rather similar to the word "prejudiced". I think
> it's an unfortunate shift, but that's how it's gone.
>
I actually did mean it to refer to the negative meaning. What I said was that
discrimination was a better term for this kind of prejudicial preference
because it was not restricted to one kind of prejudice, but didn't include
simple taste preferences since it refers to a rather active way of using one's
prejudice. Sorry if it was not clear enough.
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.