> --- Muke Tever <hotblack@...> skrev:
>> If that wasn't a typo, you may be able to find
>> better information with the spelling "Vimana".
>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vimana
>>
>> Don't know of any reliable resources, though dubious
>> ones are in no short supply.
>
> Actually, it was the Wikipedia article that sparked my
> interest.
Doh!
> I'm thinking of writing an alternate history, and it'llfeature very heavily such
> things as vimanas (vimaanaa?vimaani? what's the Sanskrit plural?) and such.
It's neuter, so... the singular would be "vima:nam" and the plural
probably "vima:na:ni".
*Muke!
--
website: