Re: verb-subject agreement
From: | Christopher B Wright <faceloran@...> |
Date: | Sunday, April 21, 2002, 23:23 |
Andriu Stareidar sekalge
>And of course, does anyone incorporate such a thing in their conlang(s)?
A new idea to try.
Lashkos would, provided (John) was not in the vocative case.
Jon[os] yimus. John go-1pl.
Sturnan, having no expressed cases, would consider (John) to be vocative.
Don regis. John, we're going.
Hansu would accept it as being Wrong. You'd be understood, but people
would give you strange looks. Perhaps that would be changed after a few
hundred years.
Joní gúmam. John-patient go-1pl.
You inspire me.
Chris Wright