Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?

From:Peter Bleackley <peter.bleackley@...>
Date:Monday, January 26, 2004, 13:52
Staving Costentin Cornomorus:
>--- Trebor Jung <treborjung@...> wrote: > > > I guess sg/pl for 2p is unnecessary, so it's > > scrapped now. > >Hardly unnecessary! Clearly inclusion/exclusion >is important to the culture that speaks this >language. Now tha's making it impossible for me >to include/exclude certain of my listeners! > >Why does tha think English has half ass patches >like "y'all" to begin with?
I once came up with the following idea for a pronoun system singular plural 1st 1st+2nd 1st+3rd 1st+2nd+3rd 2nd 2nd 2nd+3rd 3rd 3rd ie a twofold inclusive/exclusive/"all inclusive" distinction in the 1st person plural, and an inclusive/exclusive distinction in the 2nd person plural. Pete

Reply

<jcowan@...>