Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
| From: | Tristan McLeay <zsau@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Friday, January 30, 2004, 2:46 |
|---|
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Andreas Johansson wrote:
> > Back to atrocities: what do you think of "y" pronounced [w]? ;-)
>
> Fairly atrocious, but I'm positive I've seen that before.
Wossname. Ywm Fegghig /win fEdZi/, from John Cowan's spam and made up by
me. More complicated than just <y> as /w/, though; see the archives or
read <http://zsau.firespeaker.org/blosxom/conlang/sketches/ywmfeggig.html>
which is the same.
--
Tristan
Mecht most toreck, ånd absolut mecht most toreck absolutelik. Gehalchte
menn vaore nichæ ever uevel menn, jetsvao svao indfluedels evaore
nemmfremm, ånd ne othoritet.
--- Jochn Emerich Edvard Dalberg, Herr Acton
/maiS mQ:tSaitS, Qn afsluS maiS mQ:tSaitS afslulaitS. jQ:f m&: wE Sa jev
ivu m&:, ZEsi fo efluduS evuJE:f, Qn (mwipet_ho/nu:t_horit_heS)/