Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?

Andreas Johansson scripsit:

> > The last hidden atrocities of Shaquelingua are the unpronoucable "x" [x\]
> > (simultaneous [S] and [x])
>
> That's hardly unpronunceable. It's supposedly the target pronunciation of
> Swedish /S/, altho pretty much no-one seems to be using it.
That's because you can only pronounce it if you have a particular gene,
alternatively known as _swed_ or _shkh_.  I have not got this gene.

--
You let them out again, Old Man Willow!                 John Cowan
What you be a-thinking of?  You should not be waking!   jcowan@reutershealth.com
Eat earth!  Dig deep!  Drink water!  Go to sleep!       www.reutershealth.com
Bombadil is talking.                                    www.ccil.org/~cowan

Replies