Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?

Quoting Costentin Cornomorus <elemtilas@...>:

> --- Trebor Jung <treborjung@...> wrote:
>
> > I guess sg/pl for 2p is unnecessary, so it's
> > scrapped now.
>
> Hardly unnecessary! Clearly inclusion/exclusion
> is important to the culture that speaks this
> language. Now tha's making it impossible for me
> to include/exclude certain of my listeners!
>
> Why does tha think English has half ass patches
> like "y'all" to begin with?
Divisive personality disorder.

                                                  Andreas