Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: transitivity

From:Philippe Caquant <herodote92@...>
Date:Monday, September 20, 2004, 17:35
> > Paul Hopper and Sandra Thompson wrote an excellent > article in the early > 80s (Language, Vol. 56, no. 2) entitled > "Transitivity in Grammar > and Discourse". Therein they list 10 (!) different > criteria that > languages use to encode transitivity, and they show > that transitivity > is really more of a cline than a discrete > proposition. The 10 > criteria are: > > (1) Participants: two or more vs. one > (2) Kinesis: action vs. nonaction > (3) Aspect: telic vs. atelic > (4) Punctuality: punctual vs. nonpunctual > (5) Volitionality: volitional vs. nonvolitional > (6) Affirmation: affirmative vs. negative > (7) Mode: realis vs. irrealis > (8) Agency: A high in potency vs. A low in potency > (9) Affectedness of O: O totally affected vs. O > not affected > (10) Individuation of O: O highly individuated vs. O > nonindividuated > > By most of these criteria, I would say German > 'folgen' is high on > the transitivity cline, despite the fact that it > subcategorizes for > a dative object. Another point is that sometimes > verbs just lexically > specify things, and their behavior does not reflect > any actual synchronic > generalizations about where the verb fits on the > transitivity cline. > So, if we've decided to lump things as transitive or > intransitive, > I would say 'folgen' is transitive.
Those criteria seem quite interesting. In fact, it seems that the world once more collapsed under my feet. I checked in my Dictionnary for Linguistics at "transitif" and the result is that I have no more idea of what is transitive and what is not. It is said that traditionnal grammars distinguished between direct and indirect transitivity ("indirect" meaning that there must be some preposition before the complement), but that's all old-fashioned (I summarize) and now we have to think in terms of syntagms: "One could say that every verb is a transitive verb in the context of a complement nominal syntagm" (?) Then the transitive verbs can also be used intransitively (ex: Pierre mange). Other grammaticians talk about attributive intransitives (like: obéir, parler...). Well, what I meant was simply: some verbs are followed by a "complément d'objet direct" (clearly I should have written: direct transitive) in some languages, while the equivalent verbs are followed by a "complément d'objet indirect" in other languages, with or without a preposition, and the preposition used, if any, may differ from one language to another (I mean, there are usually not equivalent), and this is all purely syntactic (AFAIU, the references you give seem to imply that transitivity is something semantic that can be encoded is various ways ? or rather, something like a cloud of various concepts ?). So I shall no more use the word "transitive" since I don't understand any more what it means. Yet in my Bescherelle (tutorial for French conjugation), there is a list of all usual French verbs, and each one is followed by one or more of the abbreviations: I = intransitive T = direct transitive Ti = indirect transitive P = pronominal This was printed in 2000, so it's not so old. And transitivity is here clearly meant syntactically (it helps you to use the verb the correct way). So what should I think ? Ah, wait a minute. I have another older edition of the same book (1981) and it doesn't say the same. For ex, obéir (to obey) was intransitive in 1981 and indirect transitive in 2000. Hence probably my initial confusion. But anyway, it's still all about syntax. Oh my God, I don't know any more. P.S. What is a cline ? ===== Philippe Caquant Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intellegor illis (Ovidius). Populus me sibilat, at mihi plaudo (Horatius). Interdum stultus opportune loquitur (Henry Fielding). Scire leges non hoc est verba earum tenere, sed vim ac potestatem (Somebody). Melius est ut scandalum oriatur, quam ut veritas relinquatur (Somebody else). Ceterum censeo *vi* esse oblitterandum (Me). _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com