Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Umlaut (was: More questions)

From:Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Date:Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 21:26
Quoting Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...>:

> Hallo! > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:13:07 +0000, > Ray Brown <ray.brown@...> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, November 25, 2003, at 09:06 PM, Amanda Babcock wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:26:41AM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > > > > > >> There are three types of umlaut recognized in Germanistics: i-umlaut, > > >> or fronting, which is the type you describe; u-umlaut, or rounding; > > >> a-umlaut, or lowering. > > > > > > Is there a general tendency toward fronting, rounding, and lowering, > > > as opposed to backing, unrounding, and raising, or are these just the > > > three orthogonal operations Germanic languages chose to use? > > > > i-umlaut & a-umlaut certainly occur in Welsh and and the other Brittonic > > langs. > > i-umaut occurs in the Gaelic langs - I'm not sure if a-umlaut does. > > > > The tendency, if there is a shifting, seems to be towards one of the > > apexes of > > the 'vocalic triangle' as, I think, John's email implies. AFAIK i-umlaut > > is > > the most common variety, a-umlaut second most and u-umlaut least frequent. > > ObConlang: My conlang family provisionally designated "Q" has i-umlaut > and u-umlaut; I am considering adding a-umlaut, but I am not sure about > the latter. However, as I think about it, I think a-umlaut is a good > idea. Makes matters neatly symmetrical and more complex.
My conlang Tersnuvu - I guess it must be characterized as effectively abandoned for know; it never got much past phonology and nominal morphology anyway - managed, using only i-umlaut and reduction of diphthongs in certain positions, to expand it's vocalic inventory from /i a u ai au/ to /i y e a o u ei ey ai au/. Should I start seriously working on it again, I guess I ought to introduce a- and u-umlaut too, wrecking some REAL havoc. If you wonder what unreal havoc looks like, well, _Tersnuvu_ derives from *_taris-nu-bhu_, and is a fairly nice exemplum. _Sorva_<*_sabhar-abhan_ is already noticeably nastier, and _Esh_>*_Ariti_ is also sub-obvious. Andreas PS Full points to anyone who's figured this started out as a naming language!