Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)

From:taliesin the storyteller <taliesin-conlang@...>
Date:Thursday, December 7, 2006, 10:05
* Mia Soderquist said on 2006-12-07 02:40:43 +0100
> While sitting in a waiting room recently, I scribbled out a system of verbs > where every verb has two parts-- an auxiliary that carries > tense/aspect/mode/person/number, and then the part that carries the > content.
Just like Basque!
> I thought about a series of auxiliaries that don't mean anything > on their own, but do contribute to the meaning of the verb phrase. For > instance, there would be an auxiliary form that is used with verbs about > "being", another for "doing",
/../ Basque have at least one for intransitive verbs (izan) which is like "to be", and one for (di)transitive verbs (ukan) which is like "to have". I don't know Basque well enough to know whether there are more.
> I thought perhaps the content part could take some marking too. I thought > perhaps the reflexive could be shown there, for instance. I'll have to > think on that some more.
Basque shows the difference between infinitive, continuous and future/conditional/subjunctive on the content-verb. There are (were?) a guy here who seems to know a lot more about Basque than me though, and as usual I can't for the life of me remember his name ('cept it being one normally used by males of the species)... t.

Reply

Roger Mills <rfmilly@...>