Re: SoCal vowels (was Re: sending mail to the list)
| From: | Frank George Valoczy <valoczy@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Friday, May 4, 2001, 17:29 |
|---|
On Fri, 4 May 2001, John Cowan wrote:
> Roger Mills scripsit:
>
> > I would have very short barred-i
> > [ki-d] for "could" in casual speech, _unstressed_ position, but not
> > otherwise.
>
> Same here. "Could" when stressed is /kUd/, but unstressed /ki-d/.
>
Hm; I'm trying to figure this out now...
[wEl wI "kUd %du:] if it's stressed...
["aj k@d6 %gA:n] (A is IPA script a, right?)
I'm not sure about if it's [@] that's there, but I'm quite certain it's
not barred-i...closer to /2/...maybe a reduced /2/?
-------ferko
Ferenc Gy. Valoczy
Free British Columbia!
Virtual Votia - Vaddjamaa Internetaza: http://www.geocities.com/uralica
railways page: http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/3976/
25kV 50Hz: http://www.mp3.com/25kV50Hz
Reply