Re: The (Other) Other Grand Master Plan

tristan alexander mcleay wrote:

> (Apologies to Padraic who I sent this too accidentally. Does listserv
> alternate at random between having and not having a reply-to header, or
> something similar?)

Sort of.  The listserv adds a Reply-To: pointing to itself unless
there is already a Reply-To: header present, so if you are replying
to someone who is (somewhat against the RFC) generating a self-aimed
Reply-To:, then the reply will not go to the list.


IMHO this is Not Good, but people seem to prefer it.

--
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein