Re: your mail

andrew wrote:

> On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Tom Wier wrote:
>
> > N N wrote:
> >
> > > 1 odr chalenge 2 trad!z!onl theor!ez ov knouledge komz 4rom fem!n!zt
> zkolarsh!p.
> > [...]
> > Is anyone else having a lot of problems with N N's posts?  Mine
> > always come out like the above.
>
> This appears to be normal for N N.  To read through one of his messages
> requires the right frame of mind.  His phonology is consistant but his
> perspective is consistantly lost because it is easier to reach for the
> delete key.  Despite regular complaints about the way he writes and
> presents language he persists.  I commend him for that, but I think for
> many of us, including myself, his messages are not getting across.
To be honest, I have not once read one of his messages, not because
of spite, but just because I saw a lot  what looked like garbage, so
I didn't bother looking into it.  I didn't even realize until you told me
that you *can* actually read what he writes.

<sigh>

Well, now that I know, I might start reading them.  Maybe. ;)

===========================================
Tom Wier <artabanos@...>
AIM: Deuterotom ICQ: 4315704
<http://www.angelfire.com/tx/eclectorium/>
"Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero."

"Things just ain't the way they used to was."
     - a man on the subway
===========================================