Re: your mail
From: | Patrick Dunn <tb0pwd1@...> |
Date: | Sunday, August 1, 1999, 22:12 |
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, J. Barefoot wrote:
> >From: N N <f1f0@...>
>
> >
> >
> >[+ neceszar! engl!sh verz+?]
> >
> >
>
> Is that a question? Well, yes, I would like an english version. I would like
> to read what you have to say if I could. It's not so much interesting or
> cute as irritating.
>
> Jennifer
But that *is* an English version, just in code.
I'd be much more impressed if he wrote *entirely* in a *conlang*, not an
English replacement code (which, heck, not even the military uses
anymore!)
I do understand his reason for doing it, but I don't see a lot of actual
evidence that it works. I tried to wade through the feminist post, but
found it wasn't all that profound, although if he'd written in it standard
English some people might have found it interesting.