Re: Alteutonik (was: Intergermansk)
From: | J. 'Mach' Wust <j_mach_wust@...> |
Date: | Saturday, January 29, 2005, 3:29 |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:00:45 +0000, Ray Brown <ray.brown@...> wrote:
>On Thursday, January 27, 2005, at 09:57 , Muke Tever wrote:
...
>> which, after a while, owing perhaps to some of the difficulty of making
>> reformed English spelling look any good,
>
>It is difficult, isn't it?
It's difficult because a spelling that looks good is usually a spelling
you're used to. If you start to search for a new spelling that should look
good, then you'll end up keeping the same spelling you had before.
>Especially getting a system that does not do
>violence either to words of Latin origin or to words of Saxon origin.
You mean, not like e.g. the Italian spelling? :)
kry@s:
j. 'mach' wust
Reply