Re: Real Conlangs Here, Made-to-Order!
From: | David J. Peterson <thatbluecat@...> |
Date: | Saturday, April 26, 2003, 19:16 |
Hi Sally! I liked your talk at the Celitc Conference in Berkeley (I was the
one with the click language who posed the idea that sound symbolism appears
in other places).
You wrote:
<<You've got the conlang, 30,000 words in two minutes. Now you have to
learn it, like any natural language. Sort of defeats the purpose, doesn't
it? :)>>
My point with that message, of course, was sarcasm. As yet, I still haven't
used the word generator to actually create words. What I've been doing is
putting in phonemes and historical changes just to see what kind of words I
can get and how they look. It's pretty neat. But I still, just as always,
create words the same old way: (1) Decide the word to create; (2) decide if
it should be monomorphemic or not; (3) if so, create a form that seems to
fit; (4) if not, find a nonmonomorphemic way to represent the idea. It's
still the only satisfying way.
-David
Reply