Re: Real Conlangs Here, Made-to-Order!

Christophe Grandsire wrote:

> En réponse à Peter Clark :
>
> >        One does breath a sigh of thanks that it is at least more
>
>> advanced than the
>> previous sentient machine, which was never programmed to include
>> previous
>> messages in its replies and had the nasty habit of posting random
>> statements
>> that made little to no sense.
>
>
> Hehe, I remember that one. IIRC it was Chinese technology, and had the
> bad
> habit to duplicate itself with different, though related, names ;))) .
As I recall, the one being spoken of was Canadian or American. The
Chinese technology had a nasty habit of using its own list rather than
the normal one (the Chinese one posetd from different names, though.
Using yahoo.com.au address. Defiling the good name of .au indeed...).

--
Tristan                  <kesuari@...>

There's no such thing as an infinite loop. Eventually, the computer will break.
-- John D. Sullivan