Re: THEORY nouns and cases (was: Verbs derived from noun cases)
From: | Joe <joe@...> |
Date: | Thursday, April 29, 2004, 5:36 |
Henrik Theiling wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Trebor Jung <treborjung@...> writes:
>
>
>>Henrik wrote:
>>"E.g. when on holiday in Greenland, you might meet a polar bear, so know
>>it's name in Greenlandic: 'nanuq'. It might notice all on its own:
>>'Nanuunngilaq!' -- 'That's not a polar bear!' You might notice in return:
>>'Nanummit nerineqarpunga.' -- 'I am eaten by a polar bear.'"
>>
>>LOL! Are you sure that's correct?
>>
>>
>
>No, it's an educated guess. :-)
>
>
>
>>I thot Inuit had only the vowels /i i: a a: u u:/...
>>
>>
>
>That's totally correct, phonemically.
>
Indeed. I don't believe Canadian Inuktitut tends to represent [e] and
[o], even though they (may be, I'm not sure) there, as allophones.