Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: unergative

From:Tristan McLeay <zsau@...>
Date:Wednesday, February 18, 2004, 11:13
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Thomas R. Wier wrote:

> From: Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...> > Jonathan Knibb wrote: > > > > > > Sorry for the blatantly non-conlang-related post, but I came across the word > > > "unergative" today and, not being a linguist or knowing any personally, > > > couldn't find out what it meant. > > > > Unergative and unaccusative refer to intransitive verbs. An unergative > > verb is one whose single argument is a patient, like "burn", while an > > unaccusative verb is one whose argument is agentive, like "speak" > > Actually, you have it precisely backwards. 'Unaccusatives' are > intransitives which, in most derivational theories of grammar, > have underlying objects, but no subjects, like 'appear'. In > GB/PP/Minimalism that argument gets raised to get its case checked, > and surfaces as the subject in spite of itself. They also have a > number of properties of objects of transitive verbs. Unergative > verbs, in contrast, have underlying subjects but no object, and tend > to behave like subjects of transitive clauses, like 'dance'.
(Not the OP, but:) So if I have it right, accusative languages treat all intransitive verbs as unergative and ergative languages treat all intransitive verbs as unaccusative (grammatically, not semantically, speaking)?
> Cf: > > 'There appeared several men in the room' > *'There danced several men in the room'
This formation is a peculiarity of English (and a few other langs, perhaps), yes? What's the 'there' doing? Just sitting around being a subject so that the gramatical role of 'several men' is the same as its meaning? And thereby being further evidence that accusative/ergative/ split-s are just generalisations and concepts the languages themselves do not bother with? (i.e. an accuastive language isn't always accusative). Or something different?
> In Split-S languages, these two classes of intransitives are given > overt realization.
So A Hypothetical Language Split-S English would say: Appeared me. (or indeed 'There appeared me.') and I danced. as the usual forms? -- Tristan. (with an exhausted brain tonight)