Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: yet another new lang sketch (sorry)

From:Dr. David E. Bell <dbell@...>
Date:Saturday, November 13, 1999, 0:16
> From: J. Barefoot > > Nouns > > nominal stems > final vowel > 0 > final l > r > final k > h > final t > s > final n > no change > greater than 3 syllbles, drop final syllable
I'm not sure that I follow this? This seems to be some kind of table of mutations, but in what environments do they occur?
> cases > > sing. plural > > nom. ---- -i > acc. -an -in > relative -ua -i > (gen/erg) > dat. -eta -eti > part. -ia -i > loc. -aa -ali
What is the "relative" case used for? I foresee some kind of mixed ergative system here since you have nom/acc and erg, but no absolutive, curious! It is also unusual to see the ergative unmarked.
> One of the few sentences in this language thus far: > ani al puyan musinaan ni'i al tisuuyaa > I.rel the woman-acc see.durative-past at the doorway-loc > I used to see the woman in the doorway.
Curious! Why is the A-function argument in relative case? I would have expected nominative or ergative.
> Suggestions? Comments? It's meant to feel sort of Native > American,at least > at first glance, so what else can I do it to this end? Does > anyone actually > read these all the way through?
I read through them. I guess that's why I am still answering posts from last month. I do however read rapidly past the phonology as I find that less interesting, but a read the syntax quite thoroughly. David