Re: OT (somewhat)Re: Fom Pop uploaded

Thomas Wier wrote:

> Quoting Roger Mills <romilly@...>:
>
> > The perverse thought struck me-- if we could find out who "Fom Pop"
is/was....

> I put this question to a colleague of mine, and she found the paper-back
> copy in the department, and "according to the intro to the festscrift
> (p.ix), Fom Pop was Thomas Priestly".  We have no idea if he's still
> around, in linguistics or this world.
>
Well, duh. That'll teach me to skip prefaces.....The name isn't familiar.
Nothing relevant on google.