Re: Possible base-20 numeric system
From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
Date: | Sunday, October 24, 2004, 13:19 |
Hi!
Trebor Jung <treborjung@...> writes:
> Basic roots:
>
> nol: zero
>...
> tistïstïs: two hundred
> ...
Good! :-)
> How do you think I should combine to form higher numbers?
Well, if you want a system similar to decimal in English, decide how
many digits would make a 'paket', say n, and then have words for
20^1 -> 20
20^2 -> 400
...
20^n -> if n = 3 (as in English), that'd be it, namely: 8000
Then 20^n would correspond to the 'packet' number 1000 in English.
And then have larger numbers 20^(n*k) for k=1,... (in English: a
thousand, a million, a billion, etc.)
Say, n=3, then:
20^(3*1) = 8000 (corresponds to 1000 in English decimal system)
20^(3*2) = 64000000 (corresponds to 1000000 in English decimal system)
...
Chinese, Japanese, Korean (and others) have decimal with n=4. There
are also natlangs that have n=2.
As an option, don't be so regular, e.g. compare the Hindi system of
numbers >= 100, it's quite interesting as the packets are sometimes
n=2 and sometimes n=3.
My conlangs Tyl Sjok and Qeng|ai have n=1, but it's a bit more
complicated than that, since the base may be 2, 8, 10, and 16 (and in
principle, anything between 2 and 16), and the exponents may be in
exponential form as well.
**Henrik
Reply