| From: | Danny Wier <dawiertx@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Monday, October 25, 2004, 13:41 |
From: "Andreas Johansson"> It would be a load on memory, but there's no reason in principle you > couldn't > have unanalyzable atomic words for 0-59 just like we've got for 0-9 in > decimal.I was thinking digit symbols, but Hindi has such an irregular naming system for 1-100 the words have to be memorized by rote.