Re: [Fwd: Need help with nouns...]
From: | Larry Schelin <lschelin@...> |
Date: | Friday, October 15, 1999, 3:24 |
Nik Taylor wrote:
> Another meant to go to the list.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: Need help with nouns...
> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 19:36:03 -0400
> From: Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...>
> To: lschelin@CITLINK.NET
> References: <38055A0A.DE535909@...>
>
> Larry Schelin wrote:
> > becomes thuda-
>
> This sounds like a verb.
>
Yeah, I know, I was thinking of dropping this for most, just using it for
special constructions to describe solids melting ar liquids boiling. I don't
actually see any other uses for it.
>
> > group of: (plurals never added)
> > 2 iarah-
> > 3 iatha-
> > 4 iavah-
> > 5 or more iaghah-
>
> Groovy, I've never thought of making different affixes for different
> *size* groups.
>
Thanks.. I kinda like the idea too...
>
> > plurals:
> > general (not specific) gwavi-
> > 2 jah-
> > 3 thah-
> > 4 vah-
> > 5 or more ghah-
>
> Hmm, that's rather unusual, having a plural affix meaning "more than
> one", PLUS other non-singular numbers. Are there any natural languages
> that have dual, trial, "tetral" and plura?
>
I don't know, I've never actually looked, but it seemed intresting, and I've
gone back to what seems like a trend with this lang, one general
distinction, then more specific optional ones to follow.
>
> > less than -'ighu
> > greater than -'ura
>
> How are these used? Is it something like "old the man-greater.than" for
> "older than the man"?
>
I meant them for comparisons, but that's kinda cool... I may have to try
that...
>
> > red -ingew
>
> Colors are infixes?
>
Yeah, it seemed like an intresting thing to do, I don't know how well it'll
work, but it's at least worth a try, eh?
Joe