Re: OTTECH :RE: Adam Walker's entry FW: T-Shirt

> Date:         Fri, 6 Oct 2000 06:17:52 -0400
> From:         The Gray Wizard <dbell@...>
> Yes, my software does have tucked away (took me ages to find it) an option
> to set the Reply-To option, but you have to set it to a specific address.
> Wouldn't want all my mail being replied to conlang.  so I have to set it for
> each message I post to conlang.  None of my other lists have this problem.
I think that what this mailing list does is that it leaves a Reply-To
field in if it's there, and otherwise sets it to its own address.
Whereas other lists just set the Reply-To to the list address hard.

Since replies to personal mail will normally go to yourself, and don't
need a Reply-To, and other lists put one in anyway, you might get away
with disabling the option completely. If possible, of course --- you
actually seem to be saying that it's not.

ObLang: How is that for a focussing circumlocution, the one that I
used in the first sentence of this mail? And how about the one I just
used? (Watch out if you reply to this, the header is munged).

Lars Mathiesen (U of Copenhagen CS Dep) <thorinn@...> (Humour NOT marked)