|From:||Joseph Bridwell <zhosh@...>|
|Date:||Thursday, June 2, 2005, 20:42|
> Hmm, you could do an dental/aveolar ~ retroflex > distinction in your language. That would make it > more different from Nahuatl, I think. :PIIRC, languages in the Pama-Nyungan family (main family of Australian aboriginal languages) differentiate laminal dental~, apical alveolar, apical retroflex, laminal palatal for plosives and nasals.