From: | Joseph Bridwell <zhosh@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Thursday, June 2, 2005, 20:42 |
> Hmm, you could do an dental/aveolar ~ retroflex > distinction in your language. That would make it > more different from Nahuatl, I think. :PIIRC, languages in the Pama-Nyungan family (main family of Australian aboriginal languages) differentiate laminal dental~, apical alveolar, apical retroflex, laminal palatal for plosives and nasals.