Re: Rubaga Orthog. Part 1
From: | JS Bangs <jaspax@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 22, 2002, 20:39 |
Jeff:
I read the post of Rubaga Orthography, and I will say--it's impressively
complicated. I don't have the time (or attention span, for the moment) to
completely understand it, but it was certainly complicated and not
entirely unlikely. But very baroque. I personally don't care for the
unattatched hard, soft, and firm marks, but that's just an aesthetic
judgement.
To make it clearer and a little less intimidating, I suggest that you give
more examples, with a "walk-through" or two, describing exactly what each
letter does. (Tedious, of course, but a big help.)
Jesse S. Bangs jaspax@u.washington.edu
http://students.washington.edu/jaspax/
"If you look at a thing nine hundred and ninety-nine times, you are
perfectly safe; if you look at it the thousandth time, you are in
frightful danger of seeing it for the first time."
--G.K. Chesterton