The language organ and the ety of <grok> (Re: Serif vs. sans serif)
From: | Paul Bennett <paul.bennett@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 17:09 |
Don Blaheta>>>>>>
Quoth Kristian Jensen:
> If I were to be really picky, I'd much rather have a serif font. They
> seem to be much easier for me to read for some reason.
Legend has it that studies have been done showing that serif fonts are
easier to read. I would guess this has something to do with providing a
more distinctive shape for the eye to grok.
<<<<<<
Is there some kind of proto-ur-stuff in the language organ somewhere that dates
back to the days of cuneiform? ;)
PS:
Fabian also used the term <grok>, while we were in London, and I think I
understand it. What's the etymology of it?
*************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender. This footnote also confirms that this email message
has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
*************************************************************