Re: CPA - An ASCII-based phonetic alphabet
|From:||Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>|
|Date:||Friday, November 16, 2001, 19:15|
Steve Kramer <scooter@...> writes:
> With all of the various ideas being offered for ASCII-IPAs, is there a feeling
> among the list that X-SAMPA is inadequate for our needs here?
Not for me. I cannot read CPA, so currently I'm ignoring it until I
feal people use it.
> I must admit to finding it counter-intuitive,
Well, I kind of know it now, so it's the easiest system for me.
> If so, perhaps we could all agree on modifications to CPA or the
> other standard advanced, and use it instead as our own list
No, please not. I'd rather use a common standard than a private
version. I did some programming in computational linguistics at uni
and people were using a version of X-Sampa, too. It's a good thing to
be able to communicate. And I really don't like chaos with different