Re: Never violate a universal unless it seems like a good idea atthe time
From: | BP Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Saturday, September 6, 2003, 18:00 |
At 21:38 4.9.2003 -0400, Isidora Zamora wrote:
>. My attitude is probably close to what you
>outlined above: at least one of the less strict universals is probably
>going to get violated, and violating more than 5 or 6 (or one of the
>absolute ones, if they truly are absolute) would make it unrealistic.
>
>For me, it is important to keep it realistic.
It depends on whether it is supposed to be a húman
language of this timeline in the first place.
/BP 8^)
--
B.Philip Jonsson mailto:melrochX@melroch.se (delete X)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__
A h-ammen ledin i phith! \ \
__ ____ ____ _____________ ____ __ __ __ / /
\ \/___ \\__ \ /___ _____/\ \\__ \\ \ \ \\ \ / /
/ / / / / \ / /Melroch\ \_/ // / / // / / /
/ /___/ /_ / /\ \ / /Gaestan ~\_ // /__/ // /__/ /
/_________//_/ \_\/ /Eowine __ / / \___/\_\\___/\_\
Gwaedhvenn Angeliniel\ \______/ /a/ /_h-adar Merthol naun
~~~~~~~~~Kuinondil~~~\________/~~\__/~~~Noolendur~~~~~~
|| Lenda lenda pellalenda pellatellenda kuivie aiya! ||
"A coincidence, as we say in Middle-Earth" (JRR Tolkien)