Re: YAEPT: uu/ii (< Quick Latin pronunciation question)
From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, May 27, 2008, 15:21 |
Huh?? How does "tempus" demonstrate your "overriding" rule? I'm
completely lost.
On 5/27/08, Eugene Oh <un.doing@...> wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:51 PM, caeruleancentaur
> <caeruleancentaur@...> wrote:
>
>> In the first declension, overwhelmingly feminine, there are a few
>> masculine words, e.g., "poeta," poet. The plural is the normal -ae of
>> the first declension, "poetae," not the -i of the second.
>>
>> By analogy, wouldn't the hypothetical plural of "virus," even though
>> neuter, be the "viri" of the second declension? Why would a third
>> declension ending, "vira," be introduced?
>>
>
> There is an overriding rule in Latin that all neuter nominatives,
> accusatives and vocatives end in -um in the singular and -a in the
> plural, whichever declension pattern they belong to. Hence oppidum,
> oppida; tempus, tempora; opus, opera; animal, animalia; etc.
>
> This is different from the other two genders, which occur in
> practically all other declensions: poeta, nauta, domus, manus, etc.
>
> Eugene
>
--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>