Re: A conlang idea rolling around in my head

--- Muke Tever <hotblack@...> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:39:17 -0800, Gary Shannon
> <fiziwig@...> wrote:
> > In fact, if you can think of any ways to improve
> on it
> > please let me know.  I was thinking maybe a sixth
> > digit would narrow down the possibilities even
> more if
> > it turns out that too many glyphs share the same
> > LOPTEP number.  But I don't know what that 6th
> digit
> > might be.
>
>
> If there are that many that another digit is
> required, it might simply be
> easier to assign each sign in the LOTEP a unique
> classifier, thus LOTEP-#,
Problem is, I'd like for anyone to be able to figure
out the LOTEP number for a glyph without knowing it in
advance.  Unless there was some really simple rule for
deciding which classification number to apply then the
user would have to memorize the classification numbers
ahead of time or else search through the whole list of
glyphs for that LOTEP number anyway.

> e.g.,
>
> 02401-1,
>      |   |
>      |---|
>      |   |
>
> 02401-2,
>      -----
>        |
>        |
>      -----
>
>     .
>     .
>     .
> 02401-16.
>      ____/
>         /
>        /___
>       /
>
> maybe?
>
>         *Muke!
> --
> http://frath.net/                  E jer savne zarjé
> mas ne
> http://kohath.livejournal.com/     Se imné koone'f
> metha
> http://kohath.deviantart.com/      Brissve mé kolé
adâ.