Re: Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry
From: | Keith Gaughan <kgaughan@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, March 12, 2002, 18:26 |
From: Christophe Grandsire [mailto:christophe.grandsire@FREE.FR]
> En réponse à Peter Clark <pc451@...>:
>
> [snip excellent explanation]
>
> Well, I intended to make my own reply, but you basically said
> all I wanted to
> say, and much better than I would ever imagine doing. So
> basically this mail is
> just to tell you that I agree 100% with you. Thanks for
> explaining my opinion
> more clearly than I could ever do :)) .
At the risk of seeming like an idiot for posting a `me too' post,
and bunging up the list quota without actually contributing to
the debate, I'd like to agree with Peter & Christophe.
Oh wait! I can actually contribute something! I had a friendly
argument with a friend of mine about what activities could, in
fairness, be considered artful. Part of my response for her was a
mini-essay I put up in my weblog:
http://hereticmessiah.weblogs.com/talking/creativity
I won't bother wasting bandwidth posting it.