On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Lars Henrik Mathiesen wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:21:28 -0500
>> From: Padraic Brown <pbrown@...>
>>
>> On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Patrick Dunn wrote:
>> To be pedantic, "of" preceeds the dative/accusative, so "... of dato."
>> And don't forget "...to the conclusione..." :)
>
>Argh, you beat me... but here, "to" must gubernare the accusativum,
>since "ad" does so Latine.
But dativum in English!
>
>> >Wouldn't that be fun? hehehe
>>
>> Ah, but you should also do the same for Graecis words; and would
>> have to differentiare words borrowed from Old, Middle or Nova
>> Frankisca _and_ have to declinare them prope...
>
>"New" is a proprum Germanicum word.
Bugger.
>
>> For what it's worth, the Romani seem to have done this at least to
>> an extense with Graeca words, as most Latin gramaires have paragraphos
>> on all the words declinata in Graeca (musice, etc.).
>
>extensae (in ablativo). Latinae.
Do we haven to gon all the waye back? I thought Anglo-Normanne
was good enough!
>
>> Urk. My Old French and Anglo-Norman aren't what they should be for
>> this exercise!
>
>exercitio.
Drat. Gotst me twice!
>
>But how deep should one dig for Latinis originales to inflectere, when
>the English forma isn't realiter the same as any Latina one anyway?
Deeper and wider!
Padraic.
>
>Lars Mathiesen (U of Copenhagen CS Dep) <thorinn@...> (Humour NOT marked)
>