Re: USAGE: Internetese deviancy - the definite article
From: | Joe <joe@...> |
Date: | Friday, July 30, 2004, 8:07 |
Paul Bennett wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:23:48 -0700, Garth Wallace <gwalla@...>
> wrote:
>
>> Arthaey Angosii wrote:
>>
>>> I have one friend who uses "teh" [tE] quite a bit in his speech. One
>>> exchange I remember is telling him about some bad news that day. His
>>> sympathetic response was, "Awww, that's teh suxor."
>>
>>
>> Your friend needs to unplug immediately.
>
>
> Reactionary prescriptivist claptrap ;-)
>
> In all seriousness, many would indeed say that there's no such thing as
> "degradation" of language, just "change".
True, but it would be better if he could use it properly. 'teh suxor'
clearly means 'the sucker', as opposed to 'is teh sux' which means
'really sucks'.
Reply