Re: NATLANGS: Difthongization across Europa
From: | Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 15:11 |
Tristan McLeay skrev:
> On 19/02/08 21:48:23, Benct Philip Jonsson wrote:
>> On 18.2.2008 David J. Peterson wrote:
>>> The former is happening/happens in my English before
>>> nasals:
>> It's part of sweeping changes taking place in North
>> American English. Read the Labov articles I linked and it
>> will all become clear. I guess the risk that NAmE splits
>> into mutually incomprehensible languages is a baehd
>> thing, but the alternative is to kill it!
>
> A bad thing? As a conlanger, surely not! It's just the
> Real World conlanging for a change. Europe and India
> manage to get by just fine with lots of different
> languages. Why couldn't North America? The written
> language needn't break up right away anyway: Much like the
> status of Latin in the early stages of the Romance
> family/late stages of Vulgar Latin.
>
My remark was tungincheek! And as I said the alternative to
letting language change run its course is to kill the
language (cf. my sig!)
/BP 8^)>
--
Benct Philip Jonsson -- melroch atte melroch dotte se
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"C'est en vain que nos Josués littéraires crient
à la langue de s'arrêter; les langues ni le soleil
ne s'arrêtent plus. Le jour où elles se *fixent*,
c'est qu'elles meurent." (Victor Hugo)
Reply