Re: Non-Explanations (was Moraic codes)
|From:||John Cowan <jcowan@...>|
|Date:||Friday, July 27, 2001, 19:14|
And Rosta wrote:
> Maybe what you both mean that 'everything' includes what doesn't occur
> as well as what does occur. In that case, I agree.
> That is, it's right and proper that a theory of what the rules of
> chess are covers every possible game of chess, but it is also desirable
> that they cover no impossible pseudogames.
I missed this before.
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@...>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein