Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: 'Arabiiya

From:Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...>
Date:Tuesday, September 25, 2001, 15:02
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:28:10 EDT David Peterson <DigitalScream@...>
writes:
> In a message dated 9/24/01 11:00:01 PM, draqonfayir@JUNO.COM writes: > << I dunno... the Semitic system seems perfectly logical to me...
> I never said it wasn't logical--in fact, I find it to be the > most logical > ever, which is why I found it so easy to learn, despite the fact > that it's so > vastly different from any other language I'd studied up to that > point. > However, "logical" isn't something that can often be attributed to > many of > the world's languages, especially in such a large way; that's why I > was suggesting that it was unnatural.
- Sorry, i think i meant something like "the development of the Semitic system doesn't seem unnatural to my sense of logic"... I don't see it strange that it could come about.
> <<I seem to remember learning recently in Arabic class that like > Hebrew, > the word for "father" is _ab_. I assume that _waalid(a)_ are some > kind > of 'technical' term.>>
> Not so. "Ab" is the word for "dad"--specifically, what you'd > use with > your own dad. If you were talking about your dad to someone else > you'd use > "waalid". At least, this is the pattern that popped up with the > tapes of > native speakers that were played for us.
- Which is sort of the same difference as i meant - _ab_ is the short, "baby talk" word, (like "papa" or "dad(dy)"), while _waalid_ is the longer, derived (but not from the baby talk word) word, also more similar to the other parent - like "mo-ther" and "fa-ther" in English.
> <<I read once somewhere the theory that originally, Afro-Asiatic > had > *bi*consonantal roots - and that plus vowel and affix patterns makes > it > not much more 'strange' than Indo-European. Only afterwards, due > to > compounding and addition of third radicals did the Semitic > triconsonantal pattern emerge.>>
> Wow! That would make it make more sense... Is there anywhere I > can > hear/read more about this? > -David
- Sorry, i can't remember where i read that... but even with the three roots, it makes sense to me. Those crazy 'grades' and other things that happen to Indo-European roots are pretty similar, from what i've seen - or at least no more 'natural'. But maybe this is just a taste issue. -Stephen (Steg) "SabaaH alxayr! SabaaH annuur!"