Re: number marking

raccoon@ELKNET.NET wrote:
> > What about 'instantiating' only concrete *definite* objects,
> > and leaving the mass-quality and undefiniteness of the others
> > to rest on 'class attributes'?
>
> Hmm, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by this. It's actually been a while
> since I did anything object-oriented :O)
Sorry -- just showing off a bit... I meant to say that only
definite concrete objects should be marked explicitly, while
the rest (objects that you cannot count or 'place' exactly)
should share a common unmarked state.

> > [Sorry (just back from getting through an Object Oriented Design
> > final test)].
>
> Hope it went well!
It did, thanks, though now I'm wasted. :)


--Pablo Flores
  http://www.geocities.com/pablo-david/index.html
  http://www.geocities.com/pablo-david/draseleq.html