Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: totalitarianism [was Re: Sexual terminology]

From:Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...>
Date:Friday, December 28, 2001, 23:12
Quoting John Cowan <jcowan@...>:

> Thomas R. Wier wrote: > > > > Note that you have only proven that states can become less > > compelling, not that there is a fundamental distinction between > > one type of government or another. Surely you would not claim > > that when the United States *did* enforce this requirement > > that the United States was not at the same time some kind of > > liberal democracy, would you? > > No, I had no such thought in mind. I do continue to believe, > however, that there is a fundamental distinction between rule > by an individual or a clique on the one hand, and rule by > a movement on the other. Nazism was dangerous not because it > was the rule of Adolf Hitler, but because it was the rule > of Nobody, and when Nobody is responsible, then things like > the bureaucracy of murder become not only possible, but > seemingly inevitable.
I'm not sure how I see how that distinction work out in practice, however. It is IMHO hard to claim that Saddam Hussein is not a totalitarian despot, in that he has complete control over all aspects of human life in those parts of Iraq not patrolled by British and American aircraft, and only slightly less in those patrolled regions. He has ruthelessly laid waste to whole regions of the country and to entire populations, with chemical weapons at times. On the other hand, while his Baath party is the only legal party, and he is just the head, it actually serves as rubber stamp for his every action. Everyone knows who really controls the country and who is responsible for the government's actions, and that is Saddam and to a slightly lesser extent his two sons Uday and Qusay who run day to day affairs, as well as perhaps a handful of close military officers. The de facto structure, according to your distinction, is authoritarian because of the small number of people who in fact make the decisions, while de jure it is totalitarian because in theory all actions are supposed to be those of the party. So, what's the real difference between those two? Clearly, just as many people are dying every day from the same government. ===================================================================== Thomas Wier <trwier@...> <http://home.uchicago.edu/~trwier> "...koruphàs hetéras hetére:isi prosápto:n / Dept. of Linguistics mú:tho:n mè: teléein atrapòn mían..." University of Chicago "To join together diverse peaks of thought / 1010 E. 59th Street and not complete one road that has no turn" Chicago, IL 60637 Empedocles, _On Nature_, on speculative thinkers

Reply

John Cowan <cowan@...>