Gary Shannon said:
> [snip]
>
> First premise: Being trans-temporal their telepathic
> language lacks anything that we might call sequential
> order.
> [snip]
> For example, suppose we used the proper name "DNC:WLV"
> (pretend it means "DancesWith:Wolves"), before we can
> "talk" about this person we would exchange a cluster
> that looked like [DNC:WLV CH:WLV] and meant, roughly,
> [DanceWith:Wolves; CallHim:Wolves].
So does this mean there really is something we might call sequential order
in the language, just not at the level you've equated with word order?
-- Mark