From: | John Cowan <cowan@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Thursday, July 19, 2001, 2:16 |
Adrian Morgan scripsit:> And is there any reason why phonological/orthographical syllabification > should differ more than they have to (splitting doubles is an obvious > example where they do, but apart from that)?British English favors morphemic/etymological syllabication: pro-duct. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter