Unicode yogh? (fwd)
|From:||John Cowan <cowan@...>|
|Date:||Sunday, November 18, 2001, 19:58|
Michael Everson scripsit:
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan email@example.com
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan
> At 22:46 -0500 2001-11-17, John Cowan wrote:
> > > I was remembering a real tour-de-force of an argument
> > > for doing this written by Michael Everson
> That would be http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/wynnyogh/ezhyogh.html
> > > What I admired about it is that he was Right, but Right
> >> about a point most people would think far too trivial to be concerned
> >> with, yet he went to immense pains to state with great clarity and at
> >> great length the arguments for there being a yogh/ezh distinction.
> Thank you.
> >And not only was he Right, but he was Successful, as in his other argument
> >that Thorn should sort after Z as a distinct 27th letter of the Latin
> That would be http://www.evertype.com/standards/wynnyogh/thorn.html
> >Let us all rejoice, for twice has the Right triumphed.
> Please can we have Kurdish Q and W now?
> Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com
> 15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire/Ireland
> Telephone +353 86 807 9169 *** Fax +353 1 478 2597 (by arrangement)