Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality?
From: | Lars Finsen <lars.finsen@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 20:20 |
Den 31. mar. 2009 kl. 19.37 skreiv Brett Williams:
> It's possible to think something unsupported by language, in other
> words, but it is relatively difficult to sustain such a thought, to
> remember it,
Nevertheless it is a useful thing to do, because it may make it
easier to exploit your ability, inherited from your wordless
ancestors, to deeply understand physical nature, which is non-verbal
in character.
> and very difficult to express it to another person.
That is true. In my youth I was even much less verbal than I'm now. I
understood relativity theory with relative ease, but chatting up
girls, that was another matter, not to mention explaining the theory
to others.
As for Sapir-Whorf, I think that if the Sapir-Whorf effect is not
valid, there really isn't any much point in having all this variety
of languages, is there? So I tend to prefer to believe in it.
LEF
Replies