| From: | Garth Wallace <gwalla@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Monday, April 26, 2004, 1:53 |
Doug Dee wrote:> > (On the other hand, by this reasoning a parody like _Bored of the Rings_ > would be "derivative," but apparently that sort of thing is _not_ a copyright > violation.)Parody is considered an "original work" and is protected. In theory anyway. In practice it's a lot murkier.