><<
>It's perhaps not the same site, but I once found a site that claimed
>to do
>that, but was complete bogus. It didn't even get the sequence "1415"
>right.
>Evidently it mangled the numbers you typed in according to some
>algorithm,
>since it consistently gave the same outdata to the same indata.
>
> Andreas
> >>
>
>I make absolutely no claims to its actual accuracy, but this was the
>site I referred to:
http://www.angio.net/pi/piquery
>
>It seems to have got 1415 right, though...
>
>The string 1415 was found at position 1 counting from the first digit
>after the decimal point. The 3. is not counted.