CHAT: con-this'n'that

James Campbell wrote:

> Conphilately somehow seems appropriate for such a well-developed conculture.
> It all depends how far you want to go.
Sure.  We already have the denominations of the stamps, and
convexillology has been hot'n'heavy at times.

One mild embarrassment is that while the Monarch of Kemr is
well-known, the Monarch of the neighboring kingdoms (England and
Scotland *there* are in a personal union, as they were *here*
from James I/VI's accession until the Act of Union) is not.
He or she is a Plantagenet, though.

--
John Cowan      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)