| From: | <morphemeaddict@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sunday, February 17, 2008, 16:22 |
In a message dated 2/17/2008 06:16:15 AM Central Standard Time, joerg_rhiemeier@WEB.DE writes:> My main conlang projects are meant to be naturalistic, and thus > naturalism is the main constraint for them. So, I would not have > a stack-based syntax, an oligosynthetic structure, a taxonomic > vocabulary, or anything else one would not expect to meet in a > human natlang. >Can you explain and give examples of a stack-based syntax? stevo </HTML>
| R A Brown <ray@...> | (Re: Conlanging with constraints) BEWARE OF RE(TURN ADDRESS |