At 10:43 PM 04/13/2000 +0200, you wrote:
>At 12:42 13.4.2000 -0500, Terrence Donnelly wrote:
>
>>I've been working on a Revived Egyptian (I can't call it Restored
>>Egyptian anymore, since I found that the Mormons have claimed that
>>name). It seems to be mostly a matter of figuring out vowelling
>>patterns. The grammar of Egyptian turns out to be far more
>>fleshed out by current scholars than I had thought.
>
>Check out:
>
>Author: Loprieno, Antonio
>Title: Ancient egyptian : a linguistic introduction / Antonio Loprieno
>Published: Cambridge : New York : Cambridge Univ. Press
>Year: 1995
>Description: tab. 322 s.
>ISBN: 0-521-44384-9 (inb.)
> 0-521-44849-2 (hft.)
>Subject: Ftaa, Språk Fornegyptiska
>
Already got it!
>Working backwards from Coptic vocalism isn't easy, as Lepsius pointed out!
>
>The traditional egyptologist pronunciation with zero = /e/, 3 and ` = /a/
>and w = /u/ has something going for it to us who speak pharyngeal-deprived
>tongues. Maybe one could use /o/ for 3 or ` to distinguish them. Yikes, I
It seems that 3 and ' aren't vowels at all. 3 was most likely /n/, and
' is a glottal stop!
Already got it, too!
>Enjoy!
>
>
Awti ib.k!
>/BP
-- Terry
http://www.geocities.com/teresh_2000
http://www.geocities.com/weseb_2000